<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: filters &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/</link>
	<description>various writings on photography, whether techniques, ideas, equipment info, or just rants.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex 007</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-1471</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex 007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-1471</guid>
		<description>Hi!

I always fit a UV MC filter for more of 3 decades, as just acquired a D-300 with a VR 18-200mm travel zoom lens...decided to try the newer Hoya Pro-1 Digital UV MC filter 72mm size...it's an a ultra thin both sides MC...(Very difficulty to see the MC coating...maybe it's something very special...who knows?). I noticed an a huge improvement, among my previously Hama C-14 UV filters that I always brought.

As I live in Israel, here it's an a very dusty area...so I'm 100% sure; that a high quality UV filter used as a front lens element protector is very recommended!.

Peace,

Alex!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>I always fit a UV MC filter for more of 3 decades, as just acquired a D-300 with a VR 18-200mm travel zoom lens&#8230;decided to try the newer Hoya Pro-1 Digital UV MC filter 72mm size&#8230;it&#8217;s an a ultra thin both sides MC&#8230;(Very difficulty to see the MC coating&#8230;maybe it&#8217;s something very special&#8230;who knows?). I noticed an a huge improvement, among my previously Hama C-14 UV filters that I always brought.</p>
<p>As I live in Israel, here it&#8217;s an a very dusty area&#8230;so I&#8217;m 100% sure; that a high quality UV filter used as a front lens element protector is very recommended!.</p>
<p>Peace,</p>
<p>Alex!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-799</guid>
		<description>I used the same B&#38;W filter on my 17-55mm lens. Turbulence in an aircraft caused it to shatter. Now my lens coating is a bit damaged as a result. 

On the other hand, I'd much rather clean a filter than the lens front element...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used the same B&amp;W filter on my 17-55mm lens. Turbulence in an aircraft caused it to shatter. Now my lens coating is a bit damaged as a result. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;d much rather clean a filter than the lens front element&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Used this filter on a Fuji Digital E 900 for about 2200 shots in China last April/May with results as good as possible in those conditions.  Much better than what everyone else got without a filter.  Moved to a G9 a couple of weeks ago and have been testing one on it.  Can not get it to take a shot that is worse with it, or a shot showing flare.  Going to test it against = Tiffens and  Hoya as soon as they arrive but can't imagine shooting without.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Used this filter on a Fuji Digital E 900 for about 2200 shots in China last April/May with results as good as possible in those conditions.  Much better than what everyone else got without a filter.  Moved to a G9 a couple of weeks ago and have been testing one on it.  Can not get it to take a shot that is worse with it, or a shot showing flare.  Going to test it against = Tiffens and  Hoya as soon as they arrive but can&#8217;t imagine shooting without.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 06:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>

&lt;blockquote&gt;Billy, I use B&#038;W filters. Specifically the B&#038;W 010 Uv_haze 1x MRC.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Billy, I use B&#038;W filters. Specifically the B&#038;W 010 Uv_haze 1x MRC.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Moreau</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Moreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm,
 I am not sure that I agree with your assumption that similar damage to your front element would have occured.

The front element is significantly different in composition to a very thin unsupported filter. I had a similar event a few years ago with a filter covered 17mm.  But it didn't convince me to continue using them.  I don't use any protection filters on any of my lenses.

What would have happened if the broken filter glass had etched the surface of the lens?

lenses are fairly robust and easily insured. Flare just plain sucks and is not worth the risk.

dale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm,<br />
 I am not sure that I agree with your assumption that similar damage to your front element would have occured.</p>
<p>The front element is significantly different in composition to a very thin unsupported filter. I had a similar event a few years ago with a filter covered 17mm.  But it didn&#8217;t convince me to continue using them.  I don&#8217;t use any protection filters on any of my lenses.</p>
<p>What would have happened if the broken filter glass had etched the surface of the lens?</p>
<p>lenses are fairly robust and easily insured. Flare just plain sucks and is not worth the risk.</p>
<p>dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What kind of uv filters do you use?&lt;br /&gt;
 - billy &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of uv filters do you use?<br />
 - billy </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2007/05/31/filters/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Ouch!
Dropped one of my lenses too recently.
I would never use a lens without a bit of extra protection.

&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/51035610542@N01/537541772/" title="Photo Sharing" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch!<br />
Dropped one of my lenses too recently.<br />
I would never use a lens without a bit of extra protection.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/51035610542@N01/537541772/" title="Photo Sharing" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
