<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: this is going to hurt you more ..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/</link>
	<description>various writings on photography, whether techniques, ideas, equipment info, or just rants.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-871</guid>
		<description>

&lt;blockquote&gt;Hi there Tim ... 

I don't use a flash bracket anymore.  This is mainly because Canon doesn't offer something like Nikon's SC-29 cable which keeps the infra-red beam directed forward.  So using a flash bracket with the Canon's off-camera cord caused the mk2 and mk2N bodies to hesitate in focusing in low light.

But I don't really need a flash bracket, since very little of my flash photography is with direct flash, or with a diffuser.

When I use a Pocket Wizard, I have it velcro'd to the top of the speedlight, and keep it in place with an elastic hair band.

Neil.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hi there Tim &#8230; </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t use a flash bracket anymore.  This is mainly because Canon doesn&#8217;t offer something like Nikon&#8217;s SC-29 cable which keeps the infra-red beam directed forward.  So using a flash bracket with the Canon&#8217;s off-camera cord caused the mk2 and mk2N bodies to hesitate in focusing in low light.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t really need a flash bracket, since very little of my flash photography is with direct flash, or with a diffuser.</p>
<p>When I use a Pocket Wizard, I have it velcro&#8217;d to the top of the speedlight, and keep it in place with an elastic hair band.</p>
<p>Neil.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Broyer</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Broyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Neil,

Are you using a flash bracket at all or just the flash directly on the hotshoe of the camera?

Reason I ask:  Assuming you are bouncing anyway so that would eliminate the bracket part, but where are you holding the pocket wizard?

thanks,

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>Are you using a flash bracket at all or just the flash directly on the hotshoe of the camera?</p>
<p>Reason I ask:  Assuming you are bouncing anyway so that would eliminate the bracket part, but where are you holding the pocket wizard?</p>
<p>thanks,</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 03:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>

&lt;blockquote&gt;Alan .. I would agree with that.  The recycle time of the Canon CP-E3 and CP-E4  (or the Nikon SD-8A) is such that it just doesn't recycle that fast to generate that kind of heat.

It happens because of the Quantum battery packs, and my insistence on shooting faster than I should.  And it is exactly as you have it there - for me it is simply the cost of doing business as a professional photographer.

I would rather not have the expense .. but I simply can not afford to embarressedly shrug my shoulders helplessly in front of a client and tell them I didn't want to get the photos they paid me to get ... just because I was timid about my equipment.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Alan .. I would agree with that.  The recycle time of the Canon CP-E3 and CP-E4  (or the Nikon SD-8A) is such that it just doesn&#8217;t recycle that fast to generate that kind of heat.</p>
<p>It happens because of the Quantum battery packs, and my insistence on shooting faster than I should.  And it is exactly as you have it there - for me it is simply the cost of doing business as a professional photographer.</p>
<p>I would rather not have the expense .. but I simply can not afford to embarressedly shrug my shoulders helplessly in front of a client and tell them I didn&#8217;t want to get the photos they paid me to get &#8230; just because I was timid about my equipment.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan B.</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Isn't it true that the Canon battery pack (CP-E4, etc) will not overheat your flash like the Quantum?  Then again, it can't recycle as quickly either, but you are clearly exceeding the flashes ratings to here and causing it to overheat.  

Of course you already know this and simply consider it a cost of doing business/getting the shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it true that the Canon battery pack (CP-E4, etc) will not overheat your flash like the Quantum?  Then again, it can&#8217;t recycle as quickly either, but you are clearly exceeding the flashes ratings to here and causing it to overheat.  </p>
<p>Of course you already know this and simply consider it a cost of doing business/getting the shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-600</guid>
		<description>

&lt;blockquote&gt;Dan ... that's my thinking too.  The damaged fresnel doesn't change anything for me in the results I get.  And replacing it doesn't do much for me personally in having a 'fixed' speedlight. 

 In the end the results I get are what is important, not the actual piece of equipment.  As I said .. it isn't of much use to fall in love with a piece of equipment.

Neil vN&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dan &#8230; that&#8217;s my thinking too.  The damaged fresnel doesn&#8217;t change anything for me in the results I get.  And replacing it doesn&#8217;t do much for me personally in having a &#8216;fixed&#8217; speedlight. </p>
<p> In the end the results I get are what is important, not the actual piece of equipment.  As I said .. it isn&#8217;t of much use to fall in love with a piece of equipment.</p>
<p>Neil vN</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetneil.com/tangents/2008/01/11/this-is-going-to-hurt-you-more/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>Makes me wonder how much it would take to replace that diffusion flash filter. I guess if you're bouncing off walls all the time, you'll have a nearly infinite number of colors/textures, so even spread wouldn't be so much of an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes me wonder how much it would take to replace that diffusion flash filter. I guess if you&#8217;re bouncing off walls all the time, you&#8217;ll have a nearly infinite number of colors/textures, so even spread wouldn&#8217;t be so much of an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
